ESPEN practical guideline: Home enteral nutrition

Published:November 23, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.10.018

      Summary

      This ESPEN practical guideline will inform physicians, nurses, dieticians, pharmacists, caregivers and other home enteral nutrition (HEN) providers in a concise way about the indications and contraindications for HEN, as well as its implementation and monitoring. This guideline will also inform interested patients requiring HEN. Home parenteral nutrition is not included but will be addressed in a separate ESPEN guideline. The guideline is based on the ESPEN scientific guideline published before, which consists of 61 recommendations that have been reproduced and renumbered, along with the associated commentaries that have been shorted compared to the scientific guideline. Evidence grades and consensus levels are indicated. The guideline was commissioned and financially supported by ESPEN and the members of the guideline group were selected by ESPEN.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Clinical Nutrition
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bischoff S.C.
        • Austin P.
        • Boeykens K.
        • Chourdakis M.
        • Cuerda C.
        • Jonkers-Schuitema C.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guideline on home enteral nutrition.
        Clin Nutr. 2020; 39: 5-22
        • Bischoff S.C.
        • Singer P.
        • Koller M.
        • Barazzoni R.
        • Cederholm T.
        • van Gossum A.
        Standard operating procedures for ESPEN guidelines and consensus papers.
        Clin Nutr. 2015;
        • Cawsey S.I.
        • Soo J.
        • Gramlich L.M.
        Home enteral nutrition: outcomes relative to indication.
        Nutr Clin Pract. 2010; 25: 296-300
        • Arends J.
        • Bachmann P.
        • Baracos V.
        • Barthelemy N.
        • Bertz H.
        • Bozzetti F.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients.
        Clin Nutr. 2017; 36: 11-48
        • Arends J.
        • Baracos V.
        • Bertz H.
        • Bozzetti F.
        • Calder P.C.
        • Deutz N.E.P.
        • et al.
        ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition.
        Clin Nutr. 2017; 36: 1187-1196
        • Arends J.
        • Bodoky G.
        • Bozzetti F.
        • Fearon K.
        • Muscaritoli M.
        • Selga G.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: non-surgical oncology.
        Clin Nutr. 2006; 25: 245-259
        • Bozzetti F.
        • Arends J.
        • Lundholm K.
        • Micklewright A.
        • Zurcher G.
        • Muscaritoli M.
        ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: non-surgical oncology.
        Clin Nutr. 2009; 28: 445-454
        • Kondrup J.
        • Rasmussen H.H.
        • Hamberg O.
        • Stanga Z.
        Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials.
        Clin Nutr. 2003; 22: 321-336
        • Gomes F.
        • Schuetz P.
        • Bounoure L.
        • Austin P.
        • Ballesteros-Pomar M.
        • Cederholm T.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guidelines on nutritional support for polymorbid internal medicine patients.
        Clin Nutr. 2018; 37: 336-353
        • Kondrup J.
        • Bak L.
        • Hansen B.S.
        • Ipsen B.
        • Ronneby H.
        Outcome from nutritional support using hospital food.
        Nutrition. 1998; 14: 319-321
        • Jensen G.L.
        • Mirtallo J.
        • Compher C.
        • Dhaliwal R.
        • Forbes A.
        • Grijalba R.F.
        • et al.
        Adult starvation and disease-related malnutrition: a proposal for etiology-based diagnosis in the clinical practice setting from the International Consensus Guideline Committee.
        Clin Nutr. 2010; 29: 151-153
        • Bowrey D.J.
        • Baker M.
        • Halliday V.
        • Thomas A.L.
        • Pulikottil-Jacob R.
        • Smith K.
        • et al.
        A randomised controlled trial of six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: report on a pilot and feasibility study.
        Trials. 2015; 16: 531
        • Howard L.
        Home parenteral and enteral nutrition in cancer patients.
        Cancer. 1993; 72: 3531-3541
        • Takagi S.
        • Utsunomiya K.
        • Kuriyama S.
        • Yokoyama H.
        • Takahashi S.
        • Iwabuchi M.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of an 'half elemental diet' as maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease: a randomized-controlled trial.
        Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 24: 1333-1340
        • Paccagnella A.
        • Marcon M.L.
        • Baruffi C.
        • Giometto M.
        • Mauri A.
        • Vigo C.
        • et al.
        Enteral nutrition at home and in nursing homes: an 11-year (2002-2012) epidemiological analysis.
        Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2016; 62: 1-10
        • de Luis D.A.
        • Aller R.
        • de Luis J.
        • Izaola O.
        • Romero E.
        • Terroba M.C.
        • et al.
        Clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with home enteral nutrition in an area of Spain.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003; 57: 612-615
        • de Luis D.A.
        • Aller R.
        • Izaola O.
        • Terroba M.C.
        • Cabezas G.
        • Cuellar L.A.
        Experience of 6 years with home enteral nutrition in an area of Spain.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006; 60: 553-557
        • De Luis D.A.
        • Izaola O.
        • Cuellar L.A.
        • Terroba M.C.
        • Cabezas G.
        • De La Fuente B.
        Experience over 12 years with home enteral nutrition in a healthcare area of Spain.
        J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013; 26: 39-44
        • Gaggiotti G.
        • Ambrosi S.
        • Spazzafumo L.
        • Sgattoni C.
        • Orlandoni P.
        • Rosati S.
        Two-year outcome data from the Italian home enteral nutrition (IHEN) register.
        Clin Nutr. 1995; 14: 2-5
        • Klek S.
        • Pawlowska D.
        • Dziwiszek G.
        • Komoń H.
        • Compala P.
        • Nawojski M.
        The evolution of home enteral nutrition (HEN) in Poland during five years after implementation: a multicentre stud.
        Nutr Hosp. 2015; 32: 196-201
        • Paccagnella A.
        • Baruffi C.
        • Pizzolato D.
        • Favaro V.
        • Marcon M.L.
        • Morello M.
        • et al.
        Home enteral nutrition in adults: a five-year (2001-2005) epidemiological analysis.
        Clin Nutr. 2008; 27: 378-385
        • Schneider S.M.
        • Raina C.
        • Pugliese P.
        • Pouget I.
        • Rampal P.
        • Hebuterne X.
        Outcome of patients treated with home enteral nutrition.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001; 25: 203-209
        • Wanden-Berghe C.
        • Luengo L.M.
        • Alvarez J.
        • Burgos R.
        • Cuerda C.
        • Matia P.
        • et al.
        Spanish home enteral nutrition registry of the year 2014 and 2015 from the NADYA-SENPE Group.
        Nutr Hosp. 2017; 34: 15-18
        • Bischoff S.
        • Arends J.
        • Dörje F.
        • Engeser P.
        • Hanke G.
        • Köchling K.
        • et al.
        S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Ernährungsmedizin (DGEM) in Zusammenarbeit mit der GESKES und der AKE.
        Aktuelle Ernährungsmed. 2013; 38: e101-e154
        • Gripp S.
        • Moeller S.
        • Bolke E.
        • Schmitt G.
        • Matuschek C.
        • Asgari S.
        • et al.
        Survival prediction in terminally ill cancer patients by clinical estimates, laboratory tests, and self-rated anxiety and depression.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3313-3320
        • Druml C.
        • Ballmer P.E.
        • Druml W.
        • Oehmichen F.
        • Shenkin A.
        • Singer P.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration.
        Clin Nutr. 2016; 35: 545-556
        • Burgos R.
        • Breton I.
        • Cereda E.
        • Desport J.C.
        • Dziewas R.
        • Genton L.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guideline clinical nutrition in neurology.
        Clin Nutr. 2018; 37: 354-396
        • Williams T.
        Nasogastric tube feeding: a safe option for patients?.
        Br J Community Nurs. 2016; (Suppl Nutrition): S28-S31
        • Corry J.
        • Poon W.
        • McPhee N.
        • Milner A.D.
        • Cruickshank D.
        • Porceddu S.V.
        • et al.
        Prospective study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing (chemo)radiation.
        Head Neck. 2009; 31: 867-876
        • Nugent B.
        • Lewis S.
        • O'Sullivan J.M.
        Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (Cd007904)
        • Paleri V.
        • Roe J.W.
        • Strojan P.
        • Corry J.
        • Gregoire V.
        • Hamoir M.
        • et al.
        Strategies to reduce long-term postchemoradiation dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer: an evidence-based review.
        Head Neck. 2014; 36: 431-443
        • Wang J.
        • Liu M.
        • Liu C.
        • Ye Y.
        • Huang G.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review.
        J Radiat Res. 2014; 55: 559-567
        • Gomes Jr., C.A.
        • Andriolo R.B.
        • Bennett C.
        • Lustosa S.A.
        • Matos D.
        • Waisberg D.R.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (Cd008096)
        • Jaafar M.H.
        • Mahadeva S.
        • Morgan K.
        • Tan M.P.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric feeding in older individuals with non-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review.
        J Nutr Health Aging. 2015; 19: 190-197
        • Dwolatzky T.
        • Berezovski S.
        • Friedmann R.
        • Paz J.
        • Clarfield A.M.
        • Stessman J.
        • et al.
        A prospective comparison of the use of nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes for long-term enteral feeding in older people.
        Clin Nutr. 2001; 20: 535-540
        • McClave S.A.
        • DiBaise J.K.
        • Mullin G.E.
        • Martindale R.G.
        ACG clinical guideline: nutrition therapy in the adult hospitalized patient.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111: 315-334
        • Toussaint E.
        • Van Gossum A.
        • Ballarin A.
        • Arvanitakis M.
        Enteral access in adults.
        Clin Nutr. 2015; 34: 350-358
        • Bravo J.G.
        • Ide E.
        • Kondo A.
        • de Moura D.T.
        • de Moura E.T.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous endoscopic versus surgical gastrostomy in patients with benign and malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Clinics. 2016; 71: 169-178
        • Ljungdahl M.
        • Sundbom M.
        Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.
        Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 1248-1251
        • Rustom I.K.
        • Jebreel A.
        • Tayyab M.
        • England R.J.
        • Stafford N.D.
        Percutaneous endoscopic, radiological and surgical gastrostomy tubes: a comparison study in head and neck cancer patients.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2006; 120: 463-466
        • Croshaw R.L.
        • Nottingham J.M.
        Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: its role in providing enteric access when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is not possible.
        Am Surg. 2006; 72: 1222-1224
        • Serrano Aguayo P.
        • Gros Herguido N.
        • Parejo Campos J.
        • Barranco Moreno A.
        • Tous Romero M.D.C.
        • Pereira Cunill J.L.
        • et al.
        New laparoscopic assisted percutaneous gastrostomy. Description and comparison with others gastrostomy types.
        Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016; 16: 24-29
        • Yuan Y.
        • Zhao Y.
        • Xie T.
        • Hu Y.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous radiological gastrostomy for swallowing disturbances.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2: Cd009198
        • Lim J.H.
        • Choi S.H.
        • Lee C.
        • Seo J.Y.
        • Kang H.Y.
        • Yang J.I.
        • et al.
        Thirty-day mortality after percutaneous gastrostomy by endoscopic versus radiologic placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int Res. 2016; 14: 333-342
        • Vidhya C.
        • Phoebe D.
        • Dhina C.
        • Jayne S.
        • Robert F.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG): a comparison of outcomes at an Australian teaching hospital.
        Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018; 23: 136-140
        • Burkitt P.
        • Carter L.M.
        • Smith A.B.
        • Kanatas A.
        Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and radiologically inserted gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 49: 516-520
        • Odedra D.
        • Nasirzadeh R.
        • Menard A.
        Safety of outpatient vs inpatient percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in patients with head and neck cancers.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2016; 67: 416-419
        • Itkin M.
        • DeLegge M.H.
        • Fang J.C.
        • McClave S.A.
        • Kundu S.
        • d'Othee B.J.
        • et al.
        Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal access for enteral nutrition and decompression from the society of interventional radiology and American gastroenterological association (AGA) institute, with endorsement by Canadian interventional radiological association (CIRA) and cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of europe (CIRSE).
        Gastroenterology. 2011; 141: 742-765
        • Miller K.R.
        • McClave S.A.
        • Kiraly L.N.
        • Martindale R.G.
        • Benns M.V.
        A tutorial on enteral access in adult patients in the hospitalized setting.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38: 282-295
        • Roveron G.
        • Antonini M.
        • Barbierato M.
        • Calandrino V.
        • Canese G.
        • Chiurazzi L.F.
        • et al.
        Clinical practice guidelines for the nursing management of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy (PEG/PEJ) in adult patients: an executive summary.
        J Wound, Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2018; 45: 326-334
        • Löser C.
        • Aschl G.
        • Hebuterne X.
        • Mathus-Vliegen E.M.
        • Muscaritoli M.
        • Niv Y.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition--percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).
        Clin Nutr. 2005; 24: 848-861
        • National Nurses Nutrition Group (NNNG)
        Exit site management for gastrostomy tubes in adults and children.
        2013 (UK)
        • Cyrany J.
        • Rejchrt S.
        • Kopacova M.
        • Bures J.
        Buried bumper syndrome: a complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22: 618-627
        • Schrag S.P.
        • Sharma R.
        • Jaik N.P.
        • Seamon M.J.
        • Lukaszczyk J.J.
        • Martin N.D.
        • et al.
        Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review.
        J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007; 16: 407-418
        • Bennell J.
        Buried bumper syndrome: do we have enough evidence?.
        Br J Community Nurs. 2018; 23: S28-S30
        • McClave S.A.
        • Jafri N.S.
        Spectrum of morbidity related to bolster placement at time of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: buried bumper syndrome to leakage and peritonitis.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007; 17: 731-746
        • Blumenstein I.
        • Borger D.
        • Loitsch S.
        • Bott C.
        • Tessmer A.
        • Hartmann F.
        • et al.
        A glycerin hydrogel-based wound dressing prevents peristomal infections after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a prospective, randomized study.
        Nutr Clin Pract. 2012; 27: 422-425
        • Aschl G.
        • Kirchgatterer A.
        • Fleischer M.
        • Hinterreiter M.
        • Hubner D.
        • Kranewitter W.
        • et al.
        [The frequency of wound infections after PEG-placement and utilization of glycogel wound dressing: a randomized controlled trial].
        Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008; 120: 224-227
        • Pars H.
        • Çavusoglu H.
        Effects of 3 different methods of care on the peristomal skin integrity of children with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
        Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018; 31: 172-181
        • National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA)
        Rapid response report NPSA/2010/RRR010: early detection of complications after gastrostomy.
        2010 (UK)
        • McClave S.A.
        • Chang W.K.
        Complications of enteral access.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58: 739-751
        • Zopf Y.
        • Konturek P.
        • Nuernberger A.
        • Maiss J.
        • Zenk J.
        • Iro H.
        • et al.
        Local infection after placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a prospective study evaluating risk factors.
        Can J Gastroenterol. 2008; 22: 987-991
        • Lansdown A.B.
        • Mirastschijski U.
        • Stubbs N.
        • Scanlon E.
        • Ågren M.S.
        Zinc in wound healing: theoretical, experimental, and clinical aspects.
        Wound Repair Regen. 2007; 15: 2-16
        • Tsang T.K.
        • Eaton D.
        • Falconio M.A.
        Percutaneous ostomy dilation: a technique for dilating the closed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy sites and reinserting gastrostomies.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1989; 35: 336-337
        • Lynch C.R.
        • Fang J.C.
        Prevention and management of complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes.
        Practical Gastroenterol. 2004; 28: 66-77
        • Rahnemai-Azar A.A.
        • Rahnemaiazar A.A.
        • Naghshizadian R.
        • Kurtz A.
        • Farkas D.T.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 7739-7751
        • Pearce C.B.
        • Goggin P.M.
        • Collett J.
        • Smith L.
        • Duncan H.D.
        The 'cut and push' method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal.
        Clin Nutr. 2000; 19: 133-135
        • Agha A.
        • AlSaudi D.
        • Furnari M.
        • Abdulhadi Ali M.M.
        • Morched Chakik R.
        • Alsaudi I.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of the cut-and-push method for removing large-caliber soft percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices.
        Nutr Clin Pract. 2013; 28: 490-492
        • Villela E.L.
        • Sakai P.
        • Almeida M.R.
        • Moura E.G.
        • Faintuch J.
        Endoscopic gastrostomy replacement tubes: long-term randomized trial with five silicone commercial models.
        Clin Nutr. 2014; 33: 221-225
        • Hull M.A.
        • Rawlings J.
        • Murray F.E.
        • Field J.
        • McIntyre A.S.
        • Mahida Y.R.
        • et al.
        Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
        Lancet. 1993; 341: 869-872
        • Lee J.H.
        • Kim J.J.
        • Kim Y.H.
        • Jang J.K.
        • Son H.J.
        • Peck K.R.
        • et al.
        Increased risk of peristomal wound infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with diabetes mellitus.
        Dig Liver Dis. 2002; 34: 857-861
        • Boullata J.I.
        • Carrera A.L.
        • Harvey L.
        • Escuro A.A.
        • Hudson L.
        • Mays A.
        • et al.
        ASPEN safe practices for enteral nutrition therapy.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017; 41: 15-103
        • Crosby J.
        • Duerksen D.R.
        A prospective study of tube- and feeding-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007; 31: 274-277
        • Best C.
        • Hitchings H.
        Enteral tube feeding--from hospital to home.
        Br J Nurs. 2010; (19:174): 6-9
        • Stroud M.
        • Duncan H.
        • Nightingale J.
        Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients.
        Gut. 2003; 52 (vii1-vii12)
        • Szary N.M.
        • Arif M.
        • Matteson M.L.
        • Choudhary A.
        • Puli S.R.
        • Bechtold M.L.
        Enteral feeding within three hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement: a meta-analysis.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 45: e34-e38
        • Westaby D.
        • Young A.
        • O'Toole P.
        • Smith G.
        • Sanders D.S.
        The provision of a percutaneously placed enteral tube feeding service.
        Gut. 2010; 59: 1592-1605
        • Abu-Hilal M.
        • Hemandas A.K.
        • McPhail M.
        • Jain G.
        • Panagiotopoulou I.
        • Scibelli T.
        • et al.
        A comparative analysis of safety and efficacy of different methods of tube placement for enteral feeding following major pancreatic resection. A non-randomized study.
        Jop. 2010; 11: 8-13
        • Han-Geurts I.J.
        • Hop W.C.
        • Verhoef C.
        • Tran K.T.
        • Tilanus H.W.
        Randomized clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy.
        Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 31-35
        • Weijs T.J.
        • Berkelmans G.H.
        • Nieuwenhuijzen G.A.
        • Ruurda J.P.
        • van Hillegersberg R.
        • Soeters P.B.
        • et al.
        Routes for early enteral nutrition after esophagectomy. A systematic review.
        Clin Nutr. 2015; 34: 1-6
        • Stavroulakis T.
        • McDermott C.J.
        Enteral feeding in neurological disorders.
        Practical Neurol. 2016; 16: 352-361
        • Scott R.
        • Bowling T.E.
        Enteral tube feeding in adults.
        J Roy Coll Phys Edinb. 2015; 45: 49-54
        • White H.
        • King L.
        Enteral feeding pumps: efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability.
        Med Dev. 2014; 7: 291-298
        • Blumenstein I.
        • Shastri Y.M.
        • Stein J.
        Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 8505-8524
        • Lord L.M.
        Enteral access devices: types, function, care, and challenges.
        Nutr Clin Pract. 2018; 33: 16-38
        • Alsaeed D.
        • Furniss D.
        • Blandford A.
        • Smith F.
        • Orlu M.
        Carers' experiences of home enteral feeding: a survey exploring medicines administration challenges and strategies.
        J Clin Pharm Therapeut. 2018; 19: 19
        • Phillips N.M.
        • Nay R.
        Nursing administration of medication via enteral tubes in adults: a systematic review.
        Int J Evid Base Healthc. 2007; 5: 324-353
        • Vincent J.
        • Teng R.
        • Pelletier S.M.
        • Willavize S.A.
        • Friedman H.L.
        The bioavailability of nasogastric versus tablet-form oral trovafloxacin in healthy subjects.
        Am J Surg. 1998; 176: 23S-26S
        • Fleisher D.
        • Sheth N.
        • Kou J.H.
        Phenytoin interaction with enteral feedings administered through nasogastric tubes.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990; 14: 513-516
        • Joos E.
        • Verbeke S.
        • Mehuys E.
        • Van Bocxlaer J.
        • Remon J.P.
        • Van Winckel M.
        • et al.
        Medication administration via enteral feeding tube: a survey of pharmacists' knowledge.
        Int J Clin Pharm. 2016; 38: 10-15
        • Joos E.
        • Mehuys E.
        • Van Bocxlaer J.
        • Remon J.P.
        • Van Winckel M.
        • Boussery K.
        Knowledge of staff members of residential care facilities for individuals with intellectual disability on medication administration via enteral feeding tube.
        J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016; 60: 1066-1072
        • Joos E.
        • Mehuys E.
        • Van Bocxlaer J.
        • Remon J.P.
        • Van Winckel M.
        • Boussery K.
        Drug administration via enteral feeding tubes in residential care facilities for individuals with intellectual disability: an observational study.
        J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015; 59: 215-225
        • Joos E.
        • Mehuys E.
        • Remon J.P.
        • Van Winckel M.
        • Boussery K.
        Analysis of drug use in institutionalized individuals with intellectual disability and tube feeding.
        Acta Clin Belg: Int J Clin Lab Med. 2016; 71: 76-80
        • Joos E.
        • Van Tongelen I.
        • Wijnants K.
        • Mehuys E.
        • Van Bocxlaer J.
        • Remon J.P.
        • et al.
        Drug administration via enteral feeding tube in residential care facilities for individuals with intellectual disability: a focus group study on guideline implementation.
        J Intellect Disabil. 2016; 20: 329-340
        • Borghi R.
        • Dutra Araujo T.
        • Airoldi Vieira R.I.
        • Theodoro de Souza T.
        • Waitzberg D.L.
        ILSI Task Force on enteral nutrition; estimated composition and costs of blenderized diets.
        Nutr Hosp. 2013; 28: 2033-2038
        • Vieira M.M.C.
        • Santos V.F.N.
        • Bottoni A.
        • Morais T.B.
        Nutritional and microbiological quality of commercial and homemade blenderized whole food enteral diets for home-based enteral nutritional therapy in adults.
        Clin Nutr. 2016; 9
        • Anonymous
        Home brew' compared with commercial preparation for enteral feeding.
        Br Med J. 1982; 284: 981-982
        • Klek S.
        • Szybinski P.
        • Sierzega M.
        • Szczepanek K.
        • Sumlet M.
        • Kupiec M.
        • et al.
        Commercial enteral formulas and nutrition support teams improve the outcome of home enteral tube feeding.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011; 35: 380-385
        • Papakostas P.
        • Tsaousi G.
        • Stavrou G.
        • Rachovitsas D.
        • Tsiropoulos G.
        • Rova C.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding of locally advanced oro-pharygo-laryngeal cancer patients: blenderized or commercial food?.
        Oral Oncol. 2017; 74: 135-141
        • Ain K.B.
        • Dewitt P.A.
        • Gardner T.G.
        • Berryman S.W.
        Low-iodine tube-feeding diet for iodine-131 scanning and therapy.
        Clin Nucl Med. 1994; 19: 504-507
        • Hirakawa H.
        • Fukuda Y.
        • Tanida N.
        • Hosomi M.
        • Shimoyama T.
        Home elemental enteral hyperalimentation (HEEH) for the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease.
        Gastroenterol Jpn. 1993; 28: 379-384
        • Castellanos V.H.
        • Litchford M.D.
        • Campbell W.W.
        Modular protein supplements and their application to long-term care.
        Nutr Clin Pract. 2006; 21: 485-504
        • Suttmann U.
        • Selberg O.
        • Muller M.J.
        • Schlesinger A.
        • Gebel M.
        • Manns M.P.
        • et al.
        Home enteral nutrition in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
        Clin Nutr. 1993; 12: 287-292
        • Glade M.J.
        • Kendra D.
        • Kaminski Jr., M.V.
        Improvement in protein utilization in nursing-home patients on tube feeding supplemented with an enzyme product derived from Aspergillus Niger and bromelain.
        Nutrition. 2001; 17: 348-350
        • Whelan K.
        • Judd P.A.
        • Preedy V.R.
        • Taylor M.A.
        Enteral feeding: the effect on faecal output, the faecal microflora and SCFA concentrations.
        Proc Nutr Soc. 2004; 63: 105-113
        • Zarling E.J.
        • Edison T.
        • Berger S.
        • Leya J.
        • DeMeo M.
        Effect of dietary oat and soy fiber on bowel function and clinical tolerance in a tube feeding dependent population.
        J Am Coll Nutr. 1994; 13: 565-568
        • Kagansky M.
        • Rimon E.
        Is there a difference in metabolic outcome between different enteral formulas?.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007; 31: 320-323
        • Elia M.
        • Engfer M.B.
        • Green C.J.
        • Silk D.B.A.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis: the clinical and physiological effects of fibre-containing enteral formulae.
        Aliment Pharmacol Therapeut. 2008; 27: 120-145
        • Hise M.E.
        • Fuhrman M.P.
        The effect of diabetes-specific enteral formulae on clinical and glycemic indicators.
        Practical Gastroenterol. 2009; 20
        • Craig L.D.
        • Nicholson S.
        • Silverstone F.A.
        • Kennedy R.D.
        • Coble Voss A.
        • Allison S.
        Use of a reduced-carbohydrate, modified-fat enteral formula for improving metabolic control and clinical outcomes in long-term care residents with type 2 diabetes: results of a pilot trial.
        Nutrition. 1998; 14: 529-534
        • Pohl M.
        • Mayr P.
        • Mertl-Roetzer M.
        • Lauster F.
        • Lerch M.
        • Eriksen J.
        • et al.
        Glycaemic control in type II diabetic tube-fed patients with a new enteral formula low in carbohydrates and high in monounsaturated fatty acids: a randomised controlled trial.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59: 1221-1232
        • Elia M.
        • Ceriello A.
        • Laube H.
        • Sinclair A.J.
        • Engfer M.
        • Stratton R.J.
        Enteral nutritional support and use of diabetes-specific formulas for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Diabetes Care. 2005; 28: 2267-2279
        • Bell K.J.
        • Smart C.E.
        • Steil G.M.
        • Brand-Miller J.C.
        • King B.
        • Wolpert H.A.
        Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose control in type 1 diabetes: implications for intensive diabetes management in the continuous glucose monitoring era.
        Diabetes Care. 2015; 38: 1008-1015
        • Callahan C.M.
        • Haag K.M.
        • Weinberger M.
        • Tierney W.M.
        • Buchanan N.N.
        • Stump T.E.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: 1048-1054
        • Hyltander A.
        • Bosaeus I.
        • Svedlund J.
        • Liedman B.
        • Hugosson I.
        • Wallengren O.
        • et al.
        Supportive nutrition on recovery of metabolism, nutritional state, health-related quality of life, and exercise capacity after major surgery: a randomized study.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 3: 466-474
        • Orlandoni P.
        • Jukic Peladic N.
        • Spazzafumo L.
        • Venturini C.
        • Cola C.
        • Sparvoli D.
        • et al.
        Utility of video consultation to improve the outcomes of home enteral nutrition in a population of frail older patients.
        Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016; 16: 762-767
        • Ao P.
        • Sebastianski M.
        • Selvarajah V.
        • Gramlich L.
        Comparison of complication rates, types, and average tube patency between jejunostomy tubes and percutaneous gastrostomy tubes in a regional home enteral nutrition support program.
        Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 30: 393-397
        • Barone M.
        • Viggiani M.T.
        • Amoruso A.
        • Licinio R.
        • Iannone A.
        • Montenegro L.
        • et al.
        Influence of age and type of underlying disease on complications related to home enteral nutrition: a single Italian center experience.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38: 991-995
        • Cuerda C.
        • Planas M.
        • Gomez Candela C.
        • Luengo L.M.
        Trends in home enteral nutrition in Spain: analysis of the NADYA registry 1992-2007.
        Nutr Hosp. 2009; 24: 347-353
        • Gomes Jr., C.A.
        • Lustosa S.A.
        • Matos D.
        • Andriolo R.B.
        • Waisberg D.R.
        • Waisberg J.
        Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (Cd008096)
        • Arribas L.
        • Frias L.
        • Creus G.
        • Parejo J.
        • Urzola C.
        • Ashbaugh R.
        • et al.
        Document of standardization of enteral nutrition access in adults.
        Nutr Hosp. 2014; 30: 1-14
        • Klek S.
        • Hermanowicz A.
        • Dziwiszek G.
        • Matysiak K.
        • Szczepanek K.
        • Szybinski P.
        • et al.
        Home enteral nutrition reduces complications, length of stay, and health care costs: results from a multicenter study.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2014; 100: 609-615
        • Howard P.
        • Jonkers-Schuitema C.
        • Furniss L.
        • Kyle U.
        • Muehlebach S.
        • Odlund-Olin A.
        • et al.
        Managing the patient journey through enteral nutritional care.
        Clin Nutr. 2006; 25: 187-195
        • Attanasio A.
        • Bedin M.
        • Stocco S.
        • Negrin V.
        • Biancon A.
        • Cecchetto G.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes and complications of enteral nutrition among older adults.
        Minerva Med. 2009; 100: 159-166
        • Chang S.C.
        • Huang C.Y.
        • Lin C.H.
        • Tu S.L.
        • Chao M.S.
        • Chen M.H.
        The effects of systematic educational interventions about nasogastric tube feeding on caregivers' knowledge and skills and the incidence of feeding complications.
        J Clin Nurs. 2015; 24: 1567-1575
        • Kurien M.
        • White S.
        • Simpson G.
        • Grant J.
        • Sanders D.S.
        • McAlindon M.E.
        Managing patients with gastrostomy tubes in the community: can a dedicated enteral feed dietetic service reduce hospital readmissions?.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012; 66: 757-760
        • Day T.
        Home enteral feeding and its impact on quality of life.
        Br J Community Nurs. 2017; 22: S14-S16
        • Wanden-Berghe C.
        • Nolasco A.
        • Planas M.
        • Sanz-Valero J.
        • Rodriguez T.
        • Cuerda C.
        • et al.
        Health-related quality of life according to the main caregiver in patients with home nutritional support.
        Med Clin. 2008; 131: 281-284
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • Davey C.
        • Buxton M.J.
        • Jones D.R.
        Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.
        Health Technol Assess. 1998; 2: 1-74
        • Guo Z.
        • Wu R.
        • Zhu W.
        • Gong J.
        • Zhang W.
        • Li Y.
        • et al.
        Effect of exclusive enteral nutrition on health-related quality of life for adults with active Crohn's disease.
        Nutr Clin Pract. 2013; 28: 499-505
        • Stevens C.S.
        • Lemon B.
        • Lockwood G.A.
        • Waldron J.N.
        • Bezjak A.
        • Ringash J.
        The development and validation of a quality-of-life questionnaire for head and neck cancer patients with enteral feeding tubes: the QOL-EF.
        Support Care Cancer. 2011; 19: 1175-1182
        • Apezetxea A.
        • Carrillo L.
        • Casanueva F.
        • Cuerda C.
        • Cuesta F.
        • Irles J.A.
        • et al.
        The NutriQoL® questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with home enteral nutrition (HEN): validation and first results.
        Nutr Hosp. 2016; 33: 1260-1267
        • Cuerda M.C.
        • Apezetxea A.
        • Carrillo L.
        • Casanueva F.
        • Cuesta F.
        • Irles J.A.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of a specific questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with home enteral nutrition: NutriQoL((R)) development.
        Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016; 10: 2289-2296
        • National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care (NICE)
        Nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition.
        2006
        • Dinenage S.
        • Gower M.
        • Van Wyk J.
        • Blamey A.
        • Ashbolt K.
        • Sutcliffe M.
        • et al.
        Development and evaluation of a home enteral nutrition team.
        Nutrients. 2015; 7: 1607-1617
        • Green S.
        • Dinenage S.
        • Gower M.
        • Van Wyk J.
        Home enteral nutrition: organisation of services.
        Nurs Older People. 2013; 25: 14-18
        • Landeiro M.J.
        • Peres H.H.
        • Martins T.V.
        Evaluation of the educational technology "Caring for dependent people" by family caregivers in changes and transfers of patients and tube feeding.
        Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016; 24: e2774
        • Morton K.
        • Goodacre L.
        An exploration of the impact of home enteral tube feeding on the eating habits of the partners of adults receiving home enteral tube feeding.
        J Hum Nutr Diet. 2008; 21: 397
        • Majka A.J.
        • Wang Z.
        • Schmitz K.R.
        • Niesen C.R.
        • Larsen R.A.
        • Kinsey G.C.
        • et al.
        Care coordination to enhance management of long-term enteral tube feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38: 40-52